 |  |
| Clinique Bon Sauveur in Cange,
rural Haiti. © 2000 Partners in Health. |
More
than 50 years after the introduction of chemotherapy for the treatment of tuberculosis
(TB), the disease is far from being under control. Among curable infectious diseases,
TB remains the number-one killer—each year, 2 million people still die of
the disease and 8.4 million more fall ill (World Health Organization (WHO), 2002a).
And future projections are grim. Fewer than half of all TB cases are diagnosed,
and of those that are, fewer than 30% have access to the care recommended by the
WHO (WHO, 2002a). The increase in TB worldwide is due, in part, to the expansion
of the HIV/AIDS pandemic (WHO, 2001): at least one-third of people with HIV die
of TB (WHO, 2002a). HIV/AIDS now causes more than 3 million deaths per year (UNAIDS,
2002). More than 90% of HIV/AIDS deaths and new infections occur in poor countries
where less than 5% of those who need antiretroviral treatment have access to these
therapies (WHO, 2002b). If we consider that, on average, 10% of people with HIV
need antiretroviral treatment, the 5% figure comes down to less than 1% in sub-Saharan
Africa, the region most affected by the pandemic.
The
social contexts in which our patients became infected are an integral part of
their stories
Large-scale
social forces, such as racism, sexism, political violence, poverty and other social
inequalities, are rooted in historical and economic processes and sculpt the distribution
and outcome of HIV/AIDS and TB. We refer to these social forces as 'structural
violence' (Castro & Farmer, 2002, 2003a,b; Farmer, 2003),
which predisposes the human body to pathogenic vulnerability by shaping the risk
of infection and subsequent disease reactivation. After infection, structural
violence also determines who has access to diagnostics and effective therapy.
Drugs that could stop or slow down these epidemics, such as first- and second-line
antituberculosis medications and antiretrovirals, are not available in the places
where they are needed most, where these diseases take their highest toll. And
so the uneven distribution of medical and technological advances contributes to
increasing the 'outcome gap', shaping the incidence and prevalence of infectious
disease at the individual and social levels.
Often,
public health experts recommending policy for poor countries believe that the
high cost of treatment, the lack of infrastructure and the lack of patients' adherence
to treatment render disease control and treatment impossible. Our own experience
in providing health and social services in rural Haiti suggests that this is not
necessarily so (Farmer et al., 2001; Farmer & Castro 2002). Haiti is
the most impoverished country in Latin America and the country most affected by
TB and HIV/AIDS in the region, with a prevalence of the latter in adults of up
to 6% (UNAIDS, 2002). To illustrate how inextricably linked structural violence
is to infectious diseases, and how social forces such as poverty become embodied,
we explore the histories of three patients in the Partners In Health hospital
in rural Haiti (Clinique Bon Sauveur; Figs 1,2,3).
Two of these patients are affected by HIV/AIDS and one is ill with multidrug-resistant
TB (MDR-TB)—that is, TB resistant to at least isoniazid and rifampin. The
social contexts in which our patients became infected are an integral part of
their stories. We outline the measures we took to provide these patients with
treatment and, where possible, to redress some of the social inequalities that
caused them to fall prey to disease.
Because
the 'texture' of dire affliction is felt better from the gritty details of biography,
and as any example begs the question of its relevance, we argue that the stories
of our three patients are anything but anecdotal. In the eyes of the epidemiologist,
as well as of the political analyst, they suffered in exemplary fashion. Millions
of people living in similar circumstances can expect to meet similar fates. What
these victims—past and present—share are not personal or psychological
attributes. They do not share culture, language or a particular race. What they
do share is the experience of occupying the bottom rung of the social ladder in
inegalitarian societies.
Adeline,
36 years old, was born in the village of Kay Epin, in Haiti's Central Plateau.
Of Adeline's eight siblings, five are still alive. Her parents are peasant farmers,
although her father supplements his income by helping to run a local school. Adeline
grew up in the village, leaving rarely, except to accompany her mother to the
closest market. When she was 18, she left for the capital, Port-au-Prince, to
continue her primary education. Adeline did not remain in school for long—her
grades were poor and the cost of tuition high—and she ended up in a part-time
vocational school where she learned to sew and embroider. She lived with a sister
in Cité Soleil, a slum on the northern edge of the city. Finding enough
to eat was a constant struggle. Not long after her arrival in the city, Adeline
married Joel, a young man from the Central Plateau, and soon gave birth to a son.
Joel fell ill shortly after the birth, and died only a year later. Adeline does
not know what killed him, but now assumes it was HIV.
When
Adeline's son was about two years old, she met Ronald, the father of her second
child. He is still around, she notes, "but I'm no longer with him. He doesn't
help me at all with feeding these children. I never see him." During her early
twenties, Adeline had an episode of pneumonia, which brought her home and to our
clinic in rural Haiti. She was also diagnosed with herpes zoster, which led to
the diagnosis of her HIV infection.
For almost ten years Adeline's therapy was limited to
the treatment of her opportunistic infections. By early 1999, Adeline's chronic
enteropathy no longer responded to antimotility agents. By October she weighed
36 kg (79 lb) and could no longer get out of bed. Her father, desperate, asked
us for help to buy a coffin for her.
But
our response was much more ambitious: instead of a coffin, we gave Adeline
Structural
violence, by diminishing the margin of individual agency to make choices in life,
opens the road to the transmission of HIV to poor women
a
cocktail of three anti-HIV drugs. In November 1999, Adeline began therapy with
zidovudine, 3TC and indinavir, at no cost to her. Her diarrhoea disappeared within
two weeks; she gained 12 kg (26 lb) in the first five weeks of treatment (Farmer
et al., 2001). Adeline commented: "What can I say? The medicines are eloquent
enough. What they have done for me is amazing. Everyone was shocked when I went
home for Christmas. I was so sick before I started treatment. I was skinny, and
the medicines made me big again. I was so weak I could not walk, and now look
at me." Adeline is currently one of our community health workers, receives daily
highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and takes care of her children, who
are going to school. She added, "If the drugs cost a lot, there must be a reason.
Science made them, so science will have to find a way to get them to poor people,
since we're the ones who have AIDS." Having access to comprehensive AIDS care
(Castro et al., 2003) has saved her life, and securing a job and school
fees for her children has allowed her to avoid going back to the miserable conditions
in which she lived before.
Enna,
at age 26, has already given birth to six children. Born to an impoverished family
in Savanette, she was sent to Port-au-Prince as a restavèk—a
child servant—at ten years of age: "I used to mop the floor and cook. I
also used to baby-sit." Enna was not paid but "they gave me food to eat". At age
14, she was raped: "A man who was a friend of the family where I was staying raped
me. He waited until no one was home, then he jumped on me. I was just a child;
I did not know what was happening. This happened four times, and then I was pregnant.
The family [in Port-au-Prince] sent me away." Enna returned to Savanette, where
she almost died in childbirth.
She
later sold produce in regional markets and in Port-au-Prince. At 18 years of age,
while sleeping in a communal market depot, three men raped her. "I didn't see
them, so what could I tell the police? Besides, I was afraid of the police." Enna
regards "my entire life as a disaster. I had three children from two different
men, but neither of them would help me [financially]." In 1997, sapped by recurrent
fevers and chronic diarrhoea, she was diagnosed with TB and HIV. Treated for TB,
she gained weight but later developed oropharyngeal candidiasis and mental impairment.
She lost weight and had intermittent diarrhoea. Enna received zidovudine during
her sixth pregnancy, but the newborn baby died of severe jaundice. When her weight
dropped to 49 kg (108 lb), she was started on a regimen of zidovudine, 3TC and
efavirenz. She gained 4 kg (9 lb) in the first six months of therapy and now has
no symptoms.
 |
|
Case–control study of AIDS in rural Haitian women,
Central Plateau, from the late 1980 |
Adeline's
and Enna's stories are not that different from the stories of hundreds of poor
women with HIV/AIDS in rural Haiti. Table 1 illustrates the main social conditions
that increased the risk of HIV among the first 25 women diagnosed with the infection
at our clinic. These young women fled to Port-au-Prince in an attempt to escape
from the harshest poverty. Once in the city, most of them worked as domestic servants;
none managed to find the financial security that had proved so elusive in the
countryside. Many of them were forthright about the non-voluntary aspect of their
sexual activity, as they knew that poverty had forced them into unfavourable unions
that could secure them a steady source of income, especially if their partners
were soldiers or truck drivers rather than peasant farmers. Structural violence,
by diminishing the margin of individual agency to make choices in life, opens
the door to the transmission
The
Josephs are a large family crowded into a small house in a poor neighbourhood
in Port-au-Prince. Madame Joseph sells wares in the streets of the city; her husband
is an irregularly employed construction worker. Although they live in poverty
by any standard, theirs is a household in which it might be expected that all
eight children would attend school; one or two of them might even be expected
to find jobs.
One
of their most talented children is Jean, who was a healthy 21-year-old student
in 1997. The way Jean recalls it, his family's problems began when he started
to cough. At first he sought to treat his persistent hacking with herbal teas.
But when his cough worsened, he began to think he might have something other than
a banal cold. In the second month of his illness, now with back pain and a fever,
Jean took himself to a TB hospital in Port-au-Prince that is run by a non-governmental
organization (NGO). "It's not that I thought I had tuberculosis," he recalled.
"Not at all. It's rather that I knew they could take a chest X-ray." But Jean
did indeed have TB, and he was started that day on a four-drug regimen that included
not only rifampin, but also streptomycin, a drug that is injected intramuscularly.
"I took all my medications," he recalled anxiously, "but I kept coughing."
Towards
the end of the year, Jean's fears were heightened by an episode of haemoptysis.
Coughing up bright red blood terrified the young man, as it did his entire family.
"I knew I was getting worse, so I went to a pulmonologist." The specialist wondered
why streptomycin had been included in the initial regimen, as most rifampin-containing
regimens do not include the injectable drug. He referred Jean to the national
TB sanatorium in January 1998, where he was found to be floridly smear-positive—which
means that there were many TB bacilli in his sputum—and was admitted for
further therapy.
Jean
was an inpatient for almost three months, during which time he had therapy, under
direct observation, with the same drugs he had received previously. He remained
smear-positive throughout his time there. "I was discouraged, I wanted to stop
[taking the medications]. I was sure these medicines wouldn't do anything for
me, since I had taken them for over a year and been positive the whole time. I
stopped taking them and went to a herbalist (doktè fey) for a few
weeks." Jean was treated with various concoctions containing the bark and leaves
of trees believed to cure "tuberculosis and other lung disease". But his symptoms
persisted, and when he again began to cough up blood, he returned to the sanatorium.
Again, he was prescribed the same first-line drugs, including rifampin and isoniazid.
During that time, he was placed in an open ward with other patients, many of them
with drug-resistant diseases. "None of them were getting better," Jean recounted.
"They started talking about other medicines that were better, but they said that
the government either didn't have the medicines or wasn't going to distribute
them."
The
names of these drugs are kanamycin, cycloserine, ethionamide and ciprofloxacin.
They are far more expensive, more toxic, and less effective than rifampin and
isoniazid. There is little reason, then, to take them—unless you have the
misfortune to have MDR-TB. In these cases, such 'second-line' drugs often hold
the only real hope of a cure. Once Jean's parents had the names of these drugs,
and a prescription from one of the pulmonologists, they started selling off their
assets—furniture, a piece of land—to buy the medication. "I started
taking [second-line] medicines inside the sanatorium, and I was soon [smear-]negative.
In July, I went home," Jean recalled. "But after five months of treatment, my
parents couldn't buy any more medicines, and so I had to stop. I became positive
again."
Cost-effectiveness
arguments have, so far, mostly contributed to a strengthening of structural violence
and an amplification of the outcome gap
Jean
soon had fevers every night and suffered from drenching sweats. He coughed incessantly,
and lived in fear of haemoptysis—he had learned during his sanatorium stay
that this symptom could rapidly prove fatal. But the situation was to become even
worse. "Even though I had stopped coughing blood, my sister Maryse began coughing
in about October, and then she started coughing up blood." One after another,
the Joseph children became ill: after Maryse, the oldest, came Myrlene, who had
suffered for years with sickle-cell anaemia. Then came Kenol, the youngest. Finally,
Shella started coughing. And one by one the Joseph siblings began treatment with
first-line drugs. None of them improved; "I felt terrible," Jean recalled wistfully.
"I was getting sicker, but I mostly felt guilty. I just knew they had drug-resistant
TB, and that's why they weren't getting better. I knew it was my fault."
Because
the Joseph children did not respond to the first-line drugs, the nurse who was
administering their streptomycin injections referred them back to the NGO clinic
that had originally diagnosed Jean with TB. "She knew we were failing therapy,"
recalled Jean, "and she knew it was MDR-TB. But she said the government could
not buy the drugs for patients with MDR-TB, it could only buy first-line drugs.
So she referred us to [the NGO]." There, Jean was asked to submit a sputum sample
for culture and drug-susceptibility testing. "I never got the results. I kept
going back every couple of weeks, and they kept telling me to come back again
in a couple of weeks."
Jean worsened. Recurrent haemoptysis and coughing made
him sleepless and on edge. He woke up before dawn on those mornings when he'd
been lucky enough to sleep. He became wasted, gaunt. His sisters knew that Jean
was deeply depressed. "He blamed himself for making us all sick," said Myrlene.
"We tried to reason with him, but he didn't listen. He still blames himself."
But Jean did not give up. "I had heard that there was one place in the country
where we could be treated, and couldn't believe it. It seemed even more strange
that it would be out in the middle of nowhere when the big hospitals in Port-au-Prince
didn't have the medicines for anyone but people who could pay for them. So I came
to see for myself."
In
October 1999, Jean left for central Haiti in a crowded truck. He was coughing
and short of breath, drawing the attention of the people among whom he was sandwiched.
Once at our clinic, he did not speak to anyone involved in treating MDR-TB: "I
just spent the morning looking around," he later recounted. He evidently liked
what he saw, because in November all of the Joseph siblings came to the Clinique
Bon Sauveur and, following the requisite laboratory work, began therapy for MDR-TB,
at no cost to them. All became smear-negative within two months. Today, the five
siblings are cured and back at work.
The
stories of Adeline, Enna and Jean reflect the situation of the Haitian poor, who
constitute most of Haiti's population. Our patients learned early in their lives
that it was unlikely that they would ever attend school or have access to electricity
or safe drinking water. Furthermore, most Haitians have little access to medical
care, making them more vulnerable to contracting, and then exposing their loved
ones, to disease. In fact, with AIDS and TB being the leading causes of death
in their age group, Adeline, Enna and Jean fared better than many young Haitians
(Fig. 4).
Infectious
diseases are increasingly concentrated among the poor, who live under the tremendous
weight of structural violence, and whose social and economic rights are constantly
violated. How different would the outcome of Adeline, Enna and Jean's stories
have been had TB and HIV/AIDS been deemed to be too expensive to treat in poor
settings? What would have happened to them if they had been declared too poor
to treat and consequently been denied access to the fruits of research? What happens
when scientists no longer invest their time and resources in discovering new drugs
and diagnostic tests for those diseases that predominantly affect the poor?
HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis are transnational epidemics
that require transnational efforts. The scientific tools for the effective treatment
of these diseases, including MDR-TB, are available. Cost-effectiveness arguments
have, so far, contributed mostly to a strengthening of structural violence and
an amplification of the outcome gap. We argue that public health, medicine and
the biological sciences can develop improved tools and make them available where
they are most needed. Health policy and the financing of public health should
follow the epidemiology of disease, concentrate on equity plans and invest heavily
in efforts to redress the social and economic forces that have led the poor to
be so at risk of infectious diseases in the first place.
References
Castro, A. & Farmer, P. (2002)
Anthropologie de la violence: la culpabilisation des victims. Notre Librairie:
Rev. Litt. Sud, 148, 102108.
Castro, A. & Farmer, P. (2003a) Violence structurelle,
mondialisation et tuberculose multirésistante. Anthropol. Soc. (in
the press).
Castro,
A. & Farmer, P. (2003b) El sida y la violencia estructural: la culpabilización
de la víctima. Cuadernos Antropol. Soc. (in the press).
Castro, A. et al. (2003)
Scaling Up Health Systems to Respond to the Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Latin
America and the Caribbean. Special Edition of the Health Sector Reform Initiative
in Latin America and the Caribbean, 8. Pan American Health Organization,
Washington DC, USA.
Farmer,
P. (1999) Infections and Inequalities: The Modern Plagues. University of
California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
Farmer, P. (2003) Pathologies of Power: Health, Human
Rights, and the New War on the Poor. University of California Press, Berkeley,
California, USA.
Farmer,
P. & Castro, A. (2002) Un pilote en Haïti: de l'efficacité de
la distribution d'antiviraux dans des pays pauvres, et des objections qui lui
sont faites. Vacarme, 19, 1722.
Farmer, P. et al. (2001) Community-based approaches
to HIV treatment in resource-poor settings. Lancet, 358, 404409. | Article | PubMed
| C hemPort |
UNAIDS
(2002) Report on the HIV/AIDS Epidemic. UNAIDS, Geneva, Switzerland.
WHO (2001) Global Tuberculosis
Control: World Health Organization Report 2001. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
WHO (2002a) Global Plan to
Stop Tuberculosis. WHO, Partners In Health, and Open Society Institute, Geneva,
Switzerland.
WHO (2002b)
Scaling Up Antiretroviral Therapy in Resource-Limited Settings. WHO, Geneva,
Switzerland.
Copyright © 2003 by the European
Molecular Biology Organization